It collection of consider has actually hardened towards the a separate orthodoxy

Nội dung bài viết:

It collection of consider has actually hardened towards the a separate orthodoxy

Spot the creepy way that the fresh twist-dos graviton – totally unobserved in general – is continuously marketed inside stature due to the fact Zee experiences the publication, winding up the origin stone of conventional physics, string principle:

‘Sequence concept provides the remarkable possessions off predicting [spin-2] the law of gravity.’ – Teacher Edward Witten (M-theory founder), ‘Reflections to your Destiny of Spacetime’, Physics Today, April 1996.

“Going back to try to get years particle idea has been ruled of the a single approach to the fresh new unification of one’s Fundamental Model connections and you will quantum gravity. It’s a bold proven fact that there isn’t any evidence at all for it cutting-edge and you will unsightly conjectural theory. There is not even a critical proposition for what the fresh new dynamics of your own simple ‘M-theory’ is meant to feel otherwise any reason anyway so you can believe that their fictional character perform write a vacuum condition toward desired properties. Really the only dispute essentially provided to validate it picture of brand new community is the fact perturbative string ideas provides a great massless twist a few means meaning that you will definitely render a description of gravity, if an individual previously been able to come across an underlying idea in which perturbative string concept ‘s the perturbative extension.” [Focus added.]

The result of Witten’s twist-2 graviton psychology (implemented from the string theorists without the reservations) is the fact as i filed a newsprint to Classical and you will Quantum The law of gravity ten years ago (by the blog post), this new editor sent they to possess ‘peer-review’ and gotten a rejection choice because of the a private ‘referee’ and therefore the guy forwarded if you ask me, merely unaware attack which neglected this new physics entirely and simply stated it had been completely wrong because didn’t apply at the latest spin-dos graviton of string principle!

Now, why has that it nice genuine kid however maybe not composed his directly endorsed evidence of what is actually a beneficial “already acknowledged” anticipate to your stamina regarding the law of gravity? Commonly the guy ever before get it done?

Inside November 1964, the year in advance of researching the fresh Nobel Prize to own street integrals, Feynman provided several lectures within Cornell School to your ‘The Reputation regarding Real Law’, which have been shot of the BBC to possess transmission toward BBC2 Television when you look at the 1965

“. as well as the dimensionality question, the new sequence concept means is actually (yet, inside the most respects) limited to are simply a good perturbation concept.”

Richard P. Feynman explains in the Feynman Lectures to the Gravitation, page 29, you to definitely gravitons needn’t end up being twist-2, with not ever been observed! Not surprisingly, brand new censorship of the products by the conventional “stringy” theorists persists:

‘We do not predict you to read the report in more detail, or verify that work is correct, but you is always to be sure this new papers is suitable toward subject town. .. if for example the job is completely disconnected which have most recent [sequence principle] work in the space.’

They don’t want people really strong proof of dissent. This selection means that the arxiv shows professional-main-stream bias. They sends aside a powerful alerting message that if you require to get a scientist, dont heckle the main-stream otherwise work could well be removed.

When you look at the 2002 We didn’t score a single temporary paper regarding the an insane-appearing yet , predictive model to arxiv thru my university affiliation (there is certainly not any other acceptance needed at that time). During the emailed communication it informed me to visit score my very own web site basically wasn’t contributing to mainstream [stringy] ideas.

Do not promote the writer

Now why don’t we examine just what Feynman (1918-88) says regarding it device. The newest transcript has been wrote because the a book of the BBC inside 1965 and you can MIT force for the 1967, ‘The Reputation away from Physical Law,’ which is nevertheless in print while the a publishing from Penguin Instructions within the The united kingdomt.

Rate this post



Dịch vụ Backlink Social UY TÍN - CHẤT LƯỢNG. Số lượng Social lớn 【500 Trang Báo】. Ưu đãi hấp dẫn, Tư vấn hỗ trợ SEO hiệu quả.


Dịch vụ Book Báo PR với 【>300 Trang Báo】bao gồm: Dân trí, Vnexpress, 24h, Cafef. Chúng tôi có nhiều kinh nghiệm, chiết khấu lớn.


Backlink Báo số lượng lớn 【4O báo】, thúc đẩy TOP nhanh chóng. Hàng nghìn baclink báo chất lượng Dofollow tạo trend tốt cho Google.


【300 Guest Post】khác nhau cho đầy đủ các lĩnh vực: Bất động sản, sức khỏe, công nghệ thông tin... Guest Post đảm bảo chất lượng, Traffic lớn.